METODE REACT: UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MAHASISWA CALON GURU MEMBUAT INSTRUMEN HOTS EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN

Ridwan Santoso, Siti Tiara Maulina, Sundari Utami, Nurmalia Dewi, Melisa Melisa, Yulistia Opeska, Agustin Wela Sasih, Khusnul Khotimah, Sudawan Supriadi

Abstract


Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan mahasiswa calon guru dalam menyusun instrumen evaluasi pembelajaran Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) dengan metode REACT (Relating, Experiencing, Applying, Cooperating, Transferring). Metode REACT dipilih karena menekankan pada pengajaran yang menghubungkan konsep-konsep dengan konteks kehidupan nyata, mendorong siswa untuk mengembangkan keterampilan berpikir kritis, kreatif, dan analitis. Penelitian dilakukan melalui pendekatan Mixed Method dengan partisipasi 30 mahasiswa calon guru. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, wawancara, tes, dan analisis dokumen. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa penerapan metode REACT memberikan peningkatan signifikan terhadap kemampuan mahasiswa dalam menyusun instrumen berbasis HOTS. Metode REACT memungkinkan calon guru lebih terampil dalam merancang instrumen evaluasi yang tidak hanya mengukur kemampuan kognitif rendah tetapi juga keterampilan berpikir kritis dan kreatif siswa. Temuan ini memberikan implikasi penting bagi program pelatihan guru dalam upaya meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan di masa mendatang.

Kata Kunci: HOTS, REACT, Evaluasi, Pembelajaran, PPKn

The purpose of this study was to improve the ability of prospective teacher students in compiling Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) learning evaluation instruments using the REACT (Relating, Experiencing, Applying, Cooperating, Transferring) method. The REACT method was chosen because it emphasizes teaching that connects concepts with real-life contexts, encouraging students to develop critical, creative, and analytical thinking skills. The study was conducted through a Mixed Method approach with the participation of 30 prospective teacher students. Data were collected through observation, interviews, tests, and document analysis. The results showed that the application of the REACT method provided a significant increase in students' ability to compile HOTS-based instruments. The REACT method allows prospective teachers to be more skilled in designing evaluation instruments that not only measure low cognitive abilities but also students' critical and creative thinking skills. These findings provide important implications for teacher training programs in an effort to improve the quality of education in the future. 

Keywords: HOTS, REACT, Evaluation, Learning, Civic Education.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay Company.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom. ASCD.

Depdiknas. (2006). Panduan Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: Puskur Balitbang.

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. The Delphi Report.

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual Teaching and Learning: What It Is and Why It’s Here to Stay. Corwin Press.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan . (2017). Modul Penyusunan Soal HOTS. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kusuma, I. W. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian HOTS pada Mata Pelajaran PPKn. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 5(2), 123-134.

Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining Higher Order Thinking. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 131-137.

Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007). The New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Corwin Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote Versus Meaningful Learning. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 226-232.

Nadya, L., & Santoso, R. (2022). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa: Sebuah Action Research. Aksiologi: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(1), 37–50.

Perkins, D. (1992). Smart Schools: Better Thinking and Learning for Every Child. The Free Press.

Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and Learning to Think. National Academy Press.

Santoso, R., & Adha, M. M. (2019). Inovasi Pendidikan Karakter melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Lingkungan Sosial dan Budaya. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP Universitas Lampung, 568–575.

Santoso, R., & Marzuki, M. (2020). Assessment of learning outcomes based on Google Forms to reduce paper use. In Teacher Education and Professional Development in Industry 4.0 (pp. 296–302). CRC Press.

Santoso, R., & Wuryandani, W. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar PPKn Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Guna Meningkatkan Ketahanan Budaya Melalui Pemahaman Konsep Keberagaman. Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional, 26(2), 229. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkn.56926

Schraw, G., & Robinson, D. H. (2011). Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills. Information Age Publishing.

Thomas, A., & Thorne, G. (2009). How to Increase Higher Order Thinking. Center for Development and Learning.

Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

Winne, P. H., & Nesbit, J. C. (2010). The Psychology of Academic Achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 653-678.

Woolfolk, A. (2016). Educational Psychology (13th ed.). Pearson.

Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low-Achieving Students: Are They Mutually Exclusive? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145-181.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This journal indexed by

Google SchoolarPortal Garuda